Today my feed brought me a video about some woodcut related stuff. It seems an institution recently acquired a bunch of drawings from Hokusai that were intended for a book, but that never happened, and the drawings were never turned into woodcut prints, which is what was typically done for publishing drawings, especially someone like Hokusai, who was known for woodcuts. I already knew that Hokusai was an artist who drew (in fact, I think at one point in his later years he adopted the name, "The man who loves to draw"), and the woodcuts he is famous for had other people involved. This was not unusual, both in eastern and western traditions, where usually the credited artist is the one who came up with the idea and drew the concept, but left the carving of the block, printing, and coloring, to specialists of those skills. So the fact that these drawings were likely intended to be turned into woodcuts by someone else made sense. Hokusai's significant influence on both the Ukiyo-e style of woodcuts, and on European modernist painting has been covered elsewhere, so I don't need to state that here.
What I didn't know was that these drawings appear to be brush and ink (including ink wash) on Japanese paper, but I had probably not given it much thought. But again, it makes some sense. These are black and white drawings, not the color work we often associate with this artist, but that may have been the decision of whoever published the prints. Some Japanese woodcuts were printed in the thousands, and colors chosen are known to vary widely. Again, this is the norm in Japanese woodcut. And maybe if these were turned into a book, they would have been, but we don't know now. The new owner of this work had hired a professional woodcut printmaker to turn these drawings into black and white woodcuts, which they published as such for subscribers. This video was about that process, and the woodcutter mentioned the challenge of deciding how to turn these ink drawings into woodcuts. Relief printing is generally a digital process, in that shapes are on or off, black or the white of the paper. And these drawings included a lot of wash, or water diluted ink, which is one way of creating a gray tone, and left the cutter to decide how to turn the ink drawings into black and white carvings. Couldn't ask the original artist what he intended- he's been dead for more than 150 years.
In a way this is something I have dealt with before, as sometimes I draw directly on the wood with brush and ink, including wash tones, and have to decide how to covert it all to black and white shapes. One advantage I have is I am the artist, so whatever I decide is the correct answer. This idea that the same artist does all the drawing, cutting, and printing on a piece is a modern concept, common today. Of course, here are a few examples from my past.
First we have a large figure piece from over a decade ago, where I drew the main figure from a model, first in pencil, and then with the same lighting, with brush and ink, including some wash. I sometimes do this with head and figure pieces to give myself a drawing that more resembles what I do with charcoal, to loosen up my starting drawing.
Later I added in background, drawn with pencil and black magic markers, and cut it all at once. Here is the printed result:
In this piece I finished last year, I drew some from life and with a mirror, and some form an old charcoal drawing, but all parts using a brush and ink. Below is the original block:
And eventually I had to convert it all to relief carving, which can only be all or nothing. There are ways to get optical gray tones (in my prints these are alternate tones to shapes of black and white), but all I have to work with is black shapes and the white of the paper. The clock on the wall disappeared, but the rest is what I drew with brush and ink, and had to interpret from wash tones to relief. Below is the woodcut print that came from the brush and ink drawing:

Before I start a print, I have already decided if it will be black and white or color. Prints that are intended for black and white (such as my prints from the Fourth of July, the supermarket series, or the recent Robert Johnson prints) contain more black shapes and optical gray sections, as part of my intended value balance. Prints that are intended to be colored (such as my saints, Ecclesiastes prints, or the recent boardwalk print) have some black shapes, but there is a lot less black, as I expect to use shapes of color, and my experience as a painter tells me that colors have varying value, and these values can be used as part of the balance.
My point is that sometimes deciding what to do with grays is just part of the process for a printmaker. I have had to do it from time to time, and I survived it. I have a lot of experience printing with black ink on white paper, and I know what that will give me, and maybe that informs me for the rest.