More Sunday Morning Art Stuff
I usually watch the CBS Sunday morning show, kind of a magazine show with a host, and often there are arts related items. Today was one of those. There was a story about a woman teaching painting classes to veterans, classes being held on a former navy vessel turned museum. I've been on a few of those, and they can be fun. This person had a pretty good crowd, and more taking place in the process with remote means, such as computers. In the case of these veterans, the idea was to help them express ideas that they were otherwise unable to communicate. I don't know if drawing or painting would do much to solve all the problems of many veterans, but they can't hurt, so I am all in favor of it. The early part of the segment reminded me of an old quote passed on to me by John Siblik, one of my fellow grads in Carbondale. The quote, from Rudolph Topffer, was "The origin (of common universal for all art and ideas of beauty) lay not in the instinct to imitate appearances, but in an urge to give material form to mental conceptions." I tend to agree with this. As students we spend a lot of time drawing from objects and figures in an effort to learn how to use materials and make representational images of things, people, and places that viewers can understand. And there have been plenty of artists who have made a living painting portraits from life, or recognizable scenes, and I have studied them. Some artists have used these same subjects as a starting point to take their art into new places, or to explore unusual concepts, and I have studied them as well. However, most of the interesting art that I have seen over the long history of art came from the heads of artists, not from anything in front of them. If this art process helps some veterans get stories out of their heads and onto paper or canvas, and it helps them stabilize their lives, I'm all for it.
Where the story got more interesting for me was when the teacher said she started all her veteran students out by first doing images of their combat boots, calling it "boot camp." I can definitely relate to that, as I started so many of my classes by having students draw from shoes. An exercise in contour lines (I always did examples up on the chalkboard, to demonstrate that I wasn't asking them to do anything I wouldn't do myself), working from a simple object that is readily available, sits still, and is an organic three dimensional object. The way I see it, if you can draw a shoe, you can learn to draw a foot. And if you can learn to draw a foot, you can learn to draw any part of the body. And if you can learn to draw a body, you can draw anything. The first thing I ever did in any art class was to draw from a shoe, a work boot as a matter of fact. Professor Coleman handed it to me and told me it was my soul. Everything else I ever did followed this. So I also started all my drawing students (non-majors, basic drawing, 2D) with drawing shoes. Even had my classes observed a few times by professors from outside the department, and I gave them paper, a pencil, an eraser, and a shoe, so they could participate. My classes got great reviews, and one professor even wrote me by email to tell me that they went home that night and drew from shoes. On another occasion I had a student approach me late in the semester and show me her latest shoe drawing, which both she and her mother were very proud of, in a frame. If a student ever asked to draw from a photo on their smart phone I said no- I knew they would learn a lot more drawing from a three dimensional shoe.
Above are some student examples of contour shoe drawings, done of the first day of art class, at both colleges I worked at. All went a lot further before they were done with those semesters, but I stand by this as a good place to start. I guess that artist working with veterans feels the same way.







































